Bowel Cancer Screening cuts deaths
Thursday, December 08, 2011
A bowel cancer screening programme in England is
on course to cut deaths by a sixth, say researchers studying
results from the first million people tested.
However, the work, published in the journal Gut, has raised
concerns that the programme, launched in 2006, misses tumours in
certain parts of the colon.
Testers checked a faeces sample for signs of abnormal
bleeding.
The researcher who analysed the results said money should be
spent on bringing in more sensitive tests.
The screening programme aims to catch the tumours earlier,
meaning more patients can be cured.
Several million people aged 69 and over have now been screened,
with approximately half of those invited taking part.
When results from the first 1.08 million taking part were
collated, it was found that 2.5% of men and 1.5% of women had
received an abnormal result, and were sent for further tests,
usually colonoscopy, in which a tube with a camera on the end is
passed into the colon.
Among the men with abnormal results, 43% turned out to have
either cancer or pre-cancerous growths in their colon. The figure
for women was 11.6%.
Most of these were early-stage cancers, which are
generally easier to treat.
Professor Julietta Patnick, director of the NHS Cancer Screening
Programmes, said she was "delighted" by the results.
"We are pleased to be on track to cut bowel cancer deaths by our
target of 16% - early detection is crucial to lowering the number
deaths from bowel cancer."
However, the test appeared to be less effective at spotting
cancers in the upper section, or "right side" of the colon.
Cancer statistics from millions of people diagnosed with the
disease suggest that for every three cancers in the left side of
the colon, there will be one in the right side.
However, of the thousands of cancers found by the screening
test, only 14% were on the right side.
Prof Richard Logan, of Nottingham University, who led the study,
said it was not yet fully understood why cancers on the right-hand
side were not showing up during screening.
Among the possibilities, he said, were that they grew faster,
and were more likely to be diagnosed conventionally, or that they
were less likely to bleed and trigger a positive test result.
However, he said that the current blood test was "old
fashioned", and should be replaced by a more modern alternative
which might be more sensitive.
He said: "There is a much better test available, but it will
cost money to introduce it, and that money is not currently
there."
A spokesman for the screening programme said that the move to
the new test was being "actively considered", although no date had
been set for a change.
Deborah Alsina, the chief executive of Bowel Cancer UK, welcomed
the results, adding that separate moves to widen access to a form
of colonoscopy called flexible sigmoidoscopy would also improve
screening.
"As a higher proportion of cancers are being found in the left
side of the bowel than predicted, the rollout of flexible
sigmoidoscopy screening in the new year will help to save even more
lives.
"However, this does need to be rolled out quickly with a
sustained focus on areas with low uptake of screening."
Copyright BBC 2011